Income
inequality is very much in the news recently and I wanted to explore some
reasons for it. In looking at the reasons we will find possible cures.
I.
Savings Rates
It’s
been observed in the academic literature that those with higher incomes
generally have higher savings rates for a variety of reasons. The chart below
illustrates this.
Inequality
itself reinforces this. Having more people in the lower income percentages
decreases the overall savings rate.
II.
Taxes
When
you add local, state, and federal taxes together, total taxes seem to be
progressive until you get to around the 60-80% of high income earners. Then it
flattens out and someone in the top 1% on average pays about as much as a percentage
of their income in taxes (if not less) as those in the upper 40%.
Source: Institute on
Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model, April 2012
III.
Risk Aversion
In
my professional career I’ve noticed that people who don’t have much if any
experience with investing are much less likely to do it at all. They are certainly
less willing to take risk whether it’s in regards to investments, human
capital, or professionally. More educated individuals are also more likely to
be risk takers.[i] Riley
and Chow (1992) found risk aversion to be a function of age, education, wealth
and income.[ii]
What
to Do About It.
So
you add up savings rates, tax non-progressivity, and risk aversion and we can
only expect a high level of inequality. All of these factors are interrelated:
income, education, savings rates, taxes, risk aversion. Those with higher
education will generally have higher incomes, higher savings rates, and be less
risk averse etc.
So
what you can do to combat inequality (aside from any political stuff) is pretty
simple: (1) increase your savings rate somehow, (2) Try to keep your taxes low
by saving in 401(k)s, IRAs, and qualified dividends and capital gains rates,
etc, and (3) take some (calculated) risks whether it be in human capital,
investments, or professionally.
No comments:
Post a Comment